[SECURITY] [DLA 2392-1] jruby security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-2392-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Utkarsh Gupta
October 01, 2020 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : jruby
Version : 1.7.26-1+deb9u3
CVE ID : CVE-2020-25613
A potential HTTP request smuggling vulnerability in WEBrick
was reported.
WEBrick (bundled along with jruby) was too tolerant against
an invalid Transfer-Encoding header. This may lead to
inconsistent interpretation between WEBrick and some HTTP proxy
servers, which may allow the attacker to “smuggle” a request.
For Debian 9 stretch, this problem has been fixed in version
1.7.26-1+deb9u3.
We recommend that you upgrade your jruby packages.
For the detailed security status of jruby please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/jruby
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=5EZT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: