Control: close 825966 On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:12:12PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Control: clone -1 -2 > Control: reassign -2 upstart > Control: retitle -2 upstart: please adopt the LSB hook from /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/01-upstart-lsb > Control: block -1 by -2 > Le mardi, 31 mai 2016, 18.47:42 Michael Biebl a écrit : > > Package: lsb-base > > Version: 9.20160110 > > Severity: normal > > File: /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/01-upstart-lsb > > please consider moving /lib/lsb/init-functions.d/01-upstart-lsb to the > > upstart package. It doesn't make sense to execute that hook for > > systems which don't have upstart installed. > Looks sane indeed; thanks for the report. Let's coordinate this file move > between upstart and lsb through another bug. There is no upstart package in Debian unstable anymore, it was removed due to RC bugs. So I don't see that there's any moving to be done here. I don't recall the original rationale for including this in the lsb-base package rather than the upstart package - concern about correctness of behavior if upstart was no longer installed but still running as pid 1? - but if this script should be dropped now you should just drop it. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature