Re: Why must LSB go? Is it no longer a priority for Debian to be open?
Le mardi, 12 janvier 2016, 11.46:56 Dan Kegel a écrit :
> Partly. But I can imagine people wanting open source binaries to run
> portably, too.
Let's stay with real use cases. We're not building Debian for imaginary
people or imaginary open source binaries.
> > And there's no way Debian would have hold its
> > transition for a (not-actively checked) LSB compliance.
>
> That's part of what an LSB maintainer would do: use existing tools to
> do an automated LSB compliance check.
The LSB package is up for adoption, really. I have been the only active
maintainer since March 2012, and noone volunteered when I asked for help
in July 2015. I am not going to revert this change.
That said, I am not going to stand in the way of whoever willing to, see
https://lists.debian.org/<3225571.6GitE4oTeC@odyx.org> for the latest
update.
--
Cheers,
OdyX
Reply to: