Bug#766023: lsb-desktop: Please change the dependency from libjpeg62 to libjpeg62-turbo
Source: lsb
Version: 4.1+Debian13
Severity: important
Tags: patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear maintainer(s),
Debian is transitioning from IJG JPEG library (src:libjpeg8) to
libjpeg-turbo implementation (src:libjpeg-turbo)[1] of libjpeg62 API
with "decode from memory buffer" interface (jpeg_mem_{src,dest}).
Your package cannot be transitioned automatically as it explicitly
depends on libjpeg62 and the new package name is libjpeg62-turbo.
libjpe62-turbo is LSB compatible implementation of JPEG library.
I am not filling this as serious since it will probably work anyway
since libjpeg62-turbo Provides/Replaces/Conflicts: libjpeg62, and
libjpeg62-turbo will be definitely pulled by some other package. Thus
it will end up fine even if libjpeg62 stops being a dummy package and
starts being a real package built from src:libjpeg6b.
For more background (why the package is named libjpeg62-turbo) see:
#754988 and #763360.
Cheers,
Ondrej
1. The full Technical Committee decision can be found here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717076#235
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJURM/vXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzMEI5MzNEODBGQ0UzRDk4MUEyRDM4RkIw
Qzk5QjcwRUY0RkNCQjA3AAoJEAyZtw70/LsHWKsP/ijfnM9nqjTqP81EqVj6yGE/
u2d8eCutJqF61T3Jq9WIHriVgNuL5zgOiqIesEezK5WEdAakly8Qld/RS4dsZ3D1
M1PddANyy3xSNhjxvNKHuley5axvaMy2pgwuRVuemy5U5dC6tSmvE4lZ/OmU6xMZ
LZOzyrNHW3iYZDViSdF1p51GEQL3Tp+GP6votEZcwITHG6tApm/mxdvQsIr6+VgQ
5HHlafLndQHEEXKQcL7Nu+1MSJXg1MGFW3f7+VDifjXZMiH8ahOxrYhw7Sav/A5h
8TiA5x3dGkO+QBw1ZjgRsgXEF38I7bEBSJi2gckcaq68QuBRNNBqEkeb7ohYGyC9
OnxKhKKEjJ72qZ2i3NA9kIZI5ZhiGB6itMYkglHlHad+WJhcsdWhepf4KF3chwzf
8+/YcUo6dHIeGpy/6+OAJsIzlJ/ZJ3uFYFd3xIUzlbZ5Du0AZ/+JFkTaaPRJ8reA
TV0Z2Vb9hSYgAISzXgfOl0aZQercXKNUDIW8ug/ZtT5tZnXoquKjsakrKdv1xXUM
1UhnnjPnGUwdpnkhaAzpKdTA3WtjyZNz4FYNKj7hsmJWgjwiL/QTHgjOP2/lHJMO
EWMnZqJDxmqLraBD/RydmeAbXhfFVvgtM5V5ge2Uq0nW7OPltwlzkmAWiEDl/yTk
ie9D0mPNgLVKXku6IXbz
=dJYU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: