Processed: Re: marking lsb-base essential?

To: "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <odyx@debian.org>
Cc: Debian LSB Team <debian-lsb@lists.debian.org> (lsb-base for {403120})
Subject: Processed: Re: marking lsb-base essential?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:33:44 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.133069140829117.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4F50BD43.8010203@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 4F50BD43.8010203@debian.org>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 403120 +wontfix
Bug #403120 [lsb-base] marking lsb-base essential?
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
403120: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#403120: marking lsb-base essential?
  - From: "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" <odyx@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#403120: marking lsb-base essential?
Next by Date: Bug#642076: lsb-core: no need to remove /lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.[23]
Previous by thread: Bug#403120: marking lsb-base essential?
Next by thread: Bug#630411: #630411: libc6 should define /lib/ld-lsb-x86-64.so.3 on AMD64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread