Re: [lsb-discuss] libxml2 2.6.27 creates several failures in LSB libxml2 tests
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 03:25:50PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> Here are some excerpts from the changelog for libxml2 2.6.27 (as
> delivered by the Debian package with version 2.6.27.dfsg-1):
>
> > Sun Oct 15 22:31:42 CEST 2006 Daniel Veillard <daniel@veillard.com>
> >
> > * parser.c: fix the patch for unreproductable #343000 but
> > also fix a line/column keeping error
> > * result/errors/attr1.xml.err result/errors/attr2.xml.err
> > result/errors/name.xml.err result/errors/name2.xml.err
> > result/schemas/anyAttr-processContents-err1_0_0.err
> > result/schemas/bug312957_1_0.err: affected lines in error output
> > of the regression tests
>
> > Thu Jul 13 15:03:11 CEST 2006 Kasimier Buchcik <libxml2-cvs@cazic.net>
> >
> > * xmlsave.c: Removed the automatic generation of CDATA sections
> > for the content of the "script" and "style" elements when
> > serializing XHTML. The issue was reported by Vincent Lefevre,
> > bug #345147.
> > * result/xhtml1 result/noent/xhtml1: Adjusted regression test
> > results due to the serialization change described above.
>
> > Mon Jun 12 13:23:11 CEST 2006 Kasimier Buchcik <libxml2-cvs@cazic.net>
> >
> > * result/pattern/namespaces: Adjusted the result of a
> > regression test, since the fix of xmlGetNodePath() revealed a
> > bug in this test result.
>
> These changes cause the LSB 3.1 libxml2 tests to report the following
> failures:
>
> XML_0 98 FAIL
> XML_1 98 FAIL
> XML_11 98 FAIL
> XML_2 98 FAIL
> XML_29 3 FAIL
> XML_4 1 FAIL
> XML_4 2 FAIL
> XML_4 6 FAIL
> XML_4 7 FAIL
>
> (Journal available on request.)
>
> Any distribution shipping version 2.6.27 or later will run into these
> problems. To my knowledge, only Debian "etch" is expected to ship this
> way. IMHO, these failures should be waived.
Confirmed,
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/
veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Reply to: