Re: PAM test results on Progeny CL Core and Progeny Debian

["Christopher Yeoh" <cyeoh@samba.org>]

At 2004/4/22 11:06-0500  Jeff Licquia writes:
> I have run the lsb-test-pam 0.9.7-1 test suite on Progeny's 
> Componentized Linux Core 1.3 and on Progeny Debian 2.0 Alpha 1.  I am 
> currently attempting to make the full results available, and will follow 
> up when that is complete.
> 
> For reference, both products are based on Debian's next release 
> ("sarge").  CL Core 1.3 is based on an older version of sarge, and is 
> certified to the LSB 1.3 standard.  Progeny Debian is closer to sarge's 
> current state.
> 
> For CL Core, here are the most interesting results:
> 
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_acct_mgmt/pam_acct_mgmt 4 FAIL
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_acct_mgmt/pam_acct_mgmt 5 FAIL
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_chauthtok/pam_chauthtok 8 UNREPORTED
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_close_session/pam_close_session 2 FAIL
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_open_session/pam_open_session 3 FAIL
> 
> For Progeny Debian:
> 
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_acct_mgmt/pam_acct_mgmt 4 FAIL
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_acct_mgmt/pam_acct_mgmt 5 FAIL
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_authenticate/pam_authenticate 6 FAIL
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_close_session/pam_close_session 2 FAIL
> /tset/LSB.pam/testcases/pam_open_session/pam_open_session 3 FAIL

Hi Jeff,

Thanks for the feedback. FYI I think most of these are addressed in
bug reports in bugs.linuxbase.org (some are implementation bugs,
others are test suite bugs). The test suite bugs will be fixed
in the next lsb-pam test suite release.

btw it would be useful for us if you could make the raw journal files
available - say via a url since they're pretty big - as it makes it
much easier for us to analyse test failures and verify that reports of
failures on different distributions fail in the same way.

Regards,

Chris
-- 
cyeoh@au.ibm.com
IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group
Canberra, Australia