Re: LSB status of sarge?
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 10:29, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Jeff Licquia <email@example.com> [2004-08-19 11:09]:
> > - LSB 2.0 will require a new version of the dynamic linker,
> > ld-lsb.so.2. Symlinking this to ld-linux works, just as it did for LSB
> > 1.x.
> Does libc or some other package provide such symlinks?
The symlink is provided by the postinst of the "lsb" package. Modifying
the postinst to provide both a ld-lsb.so.1 and ld-lsb.so.2 should be
While we're at it, we should probably also resolve the issues in this
document with the appropriate Provides: in the lsb package.
> > - possible problems regarding FHS changes, such as /srv and /media
> base-files should correctly create those.
Great. I wasn't sure what the status of that was.