Re: Bug#1054180: openssl: FTBFS on loong64
Hi!
On Sat, 2023-10-21 at 12:37 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2023-10-21 13:17:33 [+0800], WANG Xuerui wrote:
> > Also the binutils instruction set support is actually complete and released
> > in 2.41, so a custom build isn't necessary either: we'd only have to wait
>
> So why all the fuzz instead of looking at what is important? binutils
> 2.41 is alread in Debian. I just gave the openssl package back and it
> built.
As a heads-up to the Loongson developers: The binutils and gcc packages are updated
very frequently, so upstream changes are usually delivered to Debian quite quickly.
There should be no need to build custom versions of gcc and binutils. Just make sure
the changes you need are backported to stable branches, i.e. to the stable branch
of gcc-13, where possible.
For binutils, Matthias Klose (doko) very often uploads preview versions as can be
seen from the release history [1]. So building a custom version of binutils should
not be necessary even when the requested changes have not been backported to a stable
branch of binutils.
Adrian
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=binutils&arch=amd64
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
Reply to: