On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 16:15 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html > > That's a checklist to evaluate a violation and what to record in case > that the evaluation is conclusive. > Whom to tell is a matter of the particular copyright situation. > Only copyright holders of the affected code can take legal action on > license violations. If this case involves the Linux kernel, the Software Freedom Conservancy are doing GPL enforcement for Linux and can be contacted about violations on Linux and other projects they represent. https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/#linux https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/help.html Also, if Conservancy v Vizio concludes in Conservancy's favour, then anyone who receives GPLed code will be able to sue for compliance, at least within California USA and possibly elsewhere too. https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part