Re: About RAM and live iso size

To: Harshad Joshi <firewalrus@gmail.com>
Cc: Debian Live <debian-live@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: About RAM and live iso size
From: Pak OS <gsm.pakos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 12:39:42 +0500
Message-id: <[🔎] CAFrSdTqKXoZWMkEYL1Q9GCdVkD6m1PmRBu48qemaHcakkofwFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAO4+coaYpLBnkmTaOeTE+m9LUHwc+1Vpz4agATFZ=OJ68GFvUg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAO4+coaYpLBnkmTaOeTE+m9LUHwc+1Vpz4agATFZ=OJ68GFvUg@mail.gmail.com>

Nope. As for as I know.

RAM usage is dependent on number of running services and live components like desktop, taskbar , login manager , any and all startup programs etc.

I was able to build a 32 bit image using icewm with SLiM , iso size around 1.5 to 2 GB, but could cold boot it in around 70-90 MB RAM.

On Sun, Sep 4, 2022, 12:13 Harshad Joshi <firewalrus@gmail.com> wrote:

How much minimum RAM is required for a live ISO that has size of about 3 GB? Is there any correlation between RAM and ISO size?

--
Check out newly released Bufferstack.IO IIoT Gateway, for details, visit - https://bufferstack.io

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: About RAM and live iso size
  - From: Harshad Joshi <firewalrus@gmail.com>

References:
- About RAM and live iso size
  - From: Harshad Joshi <firewalrus@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: About RAM and live iso size
Next by Date: Re: About RAM and live iso size
Previous by thread: About RAM and live iso size
Next by thread: Re: About RAM and live iso size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread