On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 14:28 +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I assume that the above image has been > > built with live-wrapper and here the bug report and the patch is > > about > > live-build > > I silently assumed live-wrapper because my examples > debian-live-8.4.0-i386-standard.iso > debian-live-8.4.0-amd64-standard.iso > both tell > Preparer Id : LIVE-BUILD 4.0.5-1; HTTP://LIVE- > SYSTEMS.ORG/DEVEL/LIVE-BUILD > but bear only a single partition which marks the ISO 9660 filesystem. > > > @Luca Boccassi: > Is there an example ISO available which has that FAT32 partition ? > (If it gets produced by xorriso then i need one for regression > tests.) > > What i do not understand without example is from where GRUB was > started > if not from an EFI System Partition with a BOOTX86.EFI, as in debian- > cd > ISOs. > > > Have a nice day :) > > Thomas Hi, Raphael is right, I am not using live-wrapper at all, only live-build. You can build such an image with the default configuration, as grub-efi is enabled by default, and then if you dd it to a disk or mount it and then mount boot/grub/efi.img you'll see that there is no grub.cfg in there, hence this bug report. I am not entirely sure how the UEFI implementation on this machine works, as it is third party and closed source. I did not encounter this issue with Tianocore which is very annoying but entirely expected with "industry standards" :-) -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part