Sv: live-build or live-wrapper

I have changed the RC bug severity from grave to normal, so they (live-boot/live-tasks), should stay in testing.

I remove the isc-dhcp-client package from my image through a chroot hook, maybe not the most ideal way, but I don't think there is other solutions. Maybe pinning could work through, not sure through.

- Kristian

Fra: Michael . <keltoiboy@gmail.com>
Sendt: 3. oktober 2016 10:07
Til: Daniel Pocock
Cc: debian-live@lists.debian.org
Emne: Re: live-build or live-wrapper

I haven't checked lately but last I saw live-wrapper was removed from the repo because it had rc bugs.Today I got an email from Debian telling me that other live-* packages are being removed because they no longer work. If I were you I wouldn't be changing from live-build yet and I wouldn't be removing any packages that currently work from my system.

On 3 October 2016 at 18:59, Daniel Pocock <daniel@pocock.pro> wrote:

For the PGP Clean Room project, is it better to migrate to live-wrapper
right now or to simply continue using live-build with the changes
discussed in the thread about excluding packages?

The requirements of the PGP Clean Room project are not very extreme, the
only reason for wanting to use testing instead of jessie is to get a
newer GnuPG 2.1

https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnupg2.html

Maybe that could also be resolved with a backport of GnuPG 2.1 to
jessie, although that was discussed elsewhere a few months ago and there
was some issue with backporting dependencies.