[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PXE server



Hi Philipp,

thank you very much for your support.

I changed my configuration to
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LABEL Debian LiveCD
MENU DEFAULT
KERNEL ::/debianlive/live/vmlinuz
APPEND root=/dev/nfs netboot=nfs boot=live toram=filesystem.squashfs nfsroot=192.168.7.1::/debianlive/live/ initrd=::/debianlive/live/initrd.img
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

flori@microbian:/var/lib/tftpboot/debianlive/live$ ls -l
insgesamt 1268080
-r--r--r-- 1 root root      50375 Sep  8 23:02 filesystem.packages
-r--r--r-- 1 root root        218 Sep  8 23:02 filesystem.packages-remove
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 1260589056 Sep  8 23:01 filesystem.squashfs
-r--r--r-- 1 root root   34760279 Sep  8 23:02 initrd.img
-r--r--r-- 1 root root    3112432 Sep  8 23:02 vmlinuz

After the Kernel boots I get the failure: "no supported filesystem images found at /live"

Do you have one more hint for me how to solve the issue?

Best regards

Florian

Am 02.02.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Philipp Huebner:
Hi,

I don't know what your error is exactly, but I think you're at least
missing the "boot=live" kernel parameter as that is what triggers all
the live-specific boot scripts.

Here's my pxe config:

LABEL Protokolle
         MENU default
         MENU LABEL Debian Live Protokolle System
         KERNEL protokolle/vmlinuz
         APPEND initrd=protokolle/initrd.img netboot=nfs
nfsroot=137.226.172.36:/srv/nfs/protokolle boot=live components
username=protokolle locales=de_DE.UTF-8 keyboard-layout=de quiet toram


The content of /srv/nfs/protokolle looks like this:

/srv/nfs/protokolle/
/srv/nfs/protokolle/live
/srv/nfs/protokolle/live/filesystem.squashfs
/srv/nfs/protokolle/live/vmlinuz
/srv/nfs/protokolle/live/filesystem.packages
/srv/nfs/protokolle/live/initrd.img
/srv/nfs/protokolle/live/filesystem.packages-remove
/srv/nfs/protokolle/md5sum.txt


Hope that helps!


Regards,


Reply to: