[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#779313: Sid installer broken - wrong branch in apt sources.list



jnqnfe <jnqnfe@gmail.com> (2015-02-28):
> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 22:26 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Right, so to get an installer that will work correctly as a Sid
> > > installer, you have to build a copy as such. This is what I assumed
> > > would be the case when I filed the bug.
> > 
> > Why don't you set the variable(s) you want or need in your bootloader?
> 
> Because you didn't tell me that I can!
> 
> Instead of spending a load of time researching how to tell d-i what dist
> to install, I took the opportunity to just ask you. You provided info on
> how to build my own copy of d-i with the dist changed to the version
> needed. Quite reasonably I believed this therefore was the only way to
> do it, since you didn't tell me otherwise, and hence came my assertion
> that a copy of d-i pre-built with 'sid'/'unstable' specified was needed.

It's not really reasonable to expect us to detail everything d-i can do,
and how, in all of our answers to bug reports. Also, you were asking “So
how is that done exactly?”, which I answered. You didn't ask how to pick
an option which isn't the default one…

> If you'd briefly laid out all the various options available to me in
> your previous reply (or at least just said that it can be done with
> preseeding and directed me to the manual), this discussion would have
> taken a much different path.

Well, you started by telling us how broken d-i was instead of detailing
your usecase in the first place. Since I'm not gifted with clairvoyance,
I stuck to answering questions and challenging incorrect statements.

Anyway, great to see you know what to do to get your stuff work.

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: