[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#694590: marked as done (Image created with live-build fails to perform integrity-check)



Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2012 06:52:02 +0100
with message-id <50B5A682.7000405@progress-technologies.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#694590: Image created with live-build fails to perform integrity-check
has caused the Debian Bug report #694590,
regarding Image created with live-build fails to perform integrity-check
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
694590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694590
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: live-build
Version: 3.0~a51-1

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create image with live-build
2. Add integrity-check to boot params
3. Boot it

Integrity check should be performed, but this step is skipped.
This probably happens because of addition of the first 6 lines of description
to the SHA256SUMS file.
The problem affects the official live builds also,
tested it on debian-wheezy-live-a2-i386-kde-desktop.iso
Integrity check is very important for us all, I think it should be corrected.
Thanks in advance,
Peter Ryzhenkov.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 11/28/2012 05:57 AM, Peter Ryzhenkov wrote:
Integrity check should be performed, but this step is skipped.

the correct boot parameter is 'verify-checksums', not 'integrity-check'.

--
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:          daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet:       http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/

--- End Message ---

Reply to: