On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:10:39PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 08/01/2012 04:36 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: > > What do you expect us to do > ftp-masters told me to ask the release-team to tell ftp-master that they > are allowed to process my package and (accept or reject) it for > unstable, or not. > > i suggest you either give them the permission to do so, or not (which > would be kind of weird, but anyway). Thanks for not giving any further information. I'll still try to get one (hopefully last) constructive message out. I think the situation is this: If this is not intended for wheezy and if other -live components will not use or rely on it, that's ok. However, if so, we'd like to ask you to focus on the current set of -live issues so that you're ready in time. If not, it's highly unlikely that we'll accept a package split at this point, unless being presented with very good reasons. (So far I see none except pointers to communication unavailable to us.) We want -live stuff to be able to propagate through unstable, not t-p-u in any case. That said, it seems that communication with you is very hard, given your uncooperativeness. We're also wary in which state -live is in given [1] and your reply[2]. I guess somebody of the team has to sit down and evaluate how useful -live is at this point given that we're in freeze already. We might not be willing to block the release until you have "all the foundation" in place, which should already have been happened by now. Kind regards Philipp Kern [1] <20120801080758.GA28908@gmail.com> [2] <50191874.4030709@progress-technologies.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature