On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 11:29:54PM +0200, Teodor MICU wrote: > 2010/11/13 Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>: > > Please wait until this is formally communicated. The name might as well > > still change. (Or the contents of the Release file, for pinning etc.) > > > > (I.e. the uncoordinated export from ftp-master wasn't our "wish".) > Of course we'll wait until Debian 6.0 is released anyway (there are no > packages yet in volatile or backports). > However, I don't see why having squeeze-volatile on the master debian/ > repository (and thus on all mirrors) is an issue?! IMO this is a step > forward and backports will probably follow for wheezy. Probably there > wasn't enough man power to do it for squeeze, at least this is how I > see the situation with backports -- which is exactly in the same > situation as volatile archive was for lenny with the difference that > the backports archive has less restrictions (also a good thing). It might be called -updates. It will be maintained by the Stable Release Managers in any case. I.e. the discussions with ftp-masters about the name are sadly not resolved yet. (Our fault. I was unaware that it's exported already, though.) Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature