[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problem with /scripts/persisten in persistent mode

Hi Richard,
Thank you for your quick answer.

The lh_build I used is the last one available, as I was trying to create an amd64 OS in a machine that has lenny -i386, then I started the PC with a live amd64 usb-key (I downloaded the binary from the site already prepared) in console mode, then, working on an amd64 system, I did:
#sudo apt-get install live-helper
and after that made the config and build already described.
The console mode OS isn't persistent, then I don't have the precise reference to the version of lh_build, but I constructed it the day before yesterday.

Unfortunately your suggestion didn't work (creating an ext2 partition labeled live-rw instead of a fat32 one).
I guess I'm missing something in the basic procedure, because the error message talk about "can't open  /scripts/persistent".
Where or how should I check for that script?

Thank you for your time, I appreciate that,


2010/8/31 Richard Nelson <unixabg@gmail.com>


On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Adrián Orellana <adrian03410@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I constructed a debian-live with:
> lh_config --apt apt --apt-recommends enabled --architecture amd64
> --binary-images usb-hdd --language es
> --bootappend-live "boot=persistent locale=es_AR.UTF-8 keyb=es"
> --packages "gnome gcc gparted linux-headers-2.6-${LH_LINUX_FLAVOURS}
> make rsync wireless-tools"
> --syslinux-timeout 5 --source enabled --username adrian --hostname imgPro
> lh_build
> Then I created on the same usb key a partition labeled live-rw (fat 32)

Can you try with an ext2 file system? I ask since the last time I used
persistence, I used ext2 and all was well.

> When I try to boot, I have got:
> Begin: Mounting root filesystem ... /init: .: line 171: can't open
> /scripts/persistent
> [    4.109925] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attemped to kill init!
> I don't know if I should get some script copied into the live-rw partition?
> Thanks in advance,
> Adrian

Reply to: