Bug#593241: marked as done (live-build shouldn't default to a broken kernel flavour config when using the installer)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:15:57 +0200
with message-id <4C6BCEFD.5060509@debian.org>
and subject line Re: live-build shouldn't default to a broken kernel flavour config when using the installer
has caused the Debian Bug report #593241,
regarding live-build shouldn't default to a broken kernel flavour config when using the installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
593241: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=593241
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: live-build shouldn't default to a broken kernel flavour config when using the installer
- From: <ironmark@hispeed.ch>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:26:39 +0200
- Message-id: <16666020.1281972399772.JavaMail.root@viefep13>
Subject: live-build shouldn't default to a broken kernel flavour config when using the installer
Package: live-build
Version: 2.0~a22-1
Severity: normal
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Hi,
I discovered a bug in live-build (2.0~a22-1) when playing with --linux-flavours
The debian installer can only be start sucessfully when the kernel flavour of the live system is the same as the one of the installer, however there are some other bugs (infinite install loop - a bug report will follow).
I have got errors when creating a debian live image with "486 686" or "686" --linux-flavours setting
For example 2.6.32-5-686 vs. 2.6.32-5-486 (default) leads to the following error-message in the installer process:
Please reboot with the correct kernel (2.6.32-5-486).
I got the following informations from user SynrG on IRC:
<SynrG> the bug is that live-build shouldn't default to a broken kernel flavour config when using the installer
<SynrG> the bug *isn't* to make it work with 686 tho. that's unlikely to get any attention
Regards,
Mark
-- Package-specific info:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages live-build depends on:
ii debootstrap 1.0.23 Bootstrap a basic Debian system
Versions of packages live-build recommends:
ii cpio 2.11-4 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar
ii gettext-base 0.17-11 GNU Internationalization utilities
pn gnu-fdisk <none> (no description available)
Versions of packages live-build suggests:
ii dosfstools 3.0.9-1 utilities for making and checking
ii fakeroot 1.14.4-1 Gives a fake root environment
ii genisoimage 9:1.1.10-1 Creates ISO-9660 CD-ROM filesystem
pn memtest86+ | memtest86 <none> (no description available)
pn mtools <none> (no description available)
ii parted 2.3-1 The GNU Parted disk partition resi
pn squashfs-tools | genext2fs | <none> (no description available)
ii sudo 1.7.2p7-1 Provide limited super user privile
pn syslinux | grub <none> (no description available)
pn uuid-runtime <none> (no description available)
pn win32-loader <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
in the default case, live-build should include on i386 the 486 and the
686 kernel, whereas the 486 one is the default entry to boot.
this is how it always was, however, there's another bug that was
introduced that broke this, see #581252.
this bug however can be closed.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--- End Message ---
Reply to: