Re[03]: Monitor Displays "Invalid Mode"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Daniel,
The simple answer is no, because there are no USB (.../usb-hdd)
based images. The Wyse S50 boots from USB or IDE Flash drive.
Regards,
John L. Males
Toronto, Ontario
Canada
29 April 2010 03:53
Message replied to:
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:48:00 -0400
From: "John L. Males" <jlmales@bluebottle.com>
To: debian-live@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re[02]: Monitor Displays "Invalid Mode"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> First I hope the mailing list is able to attach this reply the
> the thread started by my initial eMail below.
>
> While this issue from a Debian perspective "is a problem of
> the xorg autodetection, nothing we can do about here regarding
> debian live" why is any other debian and non-Debian derivative
> LiveCD/LiveUSB do not have this problem? I have to assume
> they all use xorg as well? Examples that have not even a
> hick-up detecting the correct video are Knoppix, Puppy Linux,
> DSL, Ubuntu and Wyse Linux V6.x.x. It would seem from that
> perspective the problem is really Debian based.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> John L. Males
> Toronto, Ontario
> Canada
> 28 April 2010 22:48
>
>
> Message replied to:
>
> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:19:23 -0400
> From: "John L. Males" <jlmales@bluebottle.com>
> To: debian-live@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Monitor Displays "Invalid Mode"
>
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Please be advised none of the V5.x Debian Live USB images
> > have worked with the Dell LCD Model E152FPc and Wyse S50
> > video. The result is the same "Invalid Mode" display by the
> > Dell LCD. All other distributions I have tried have had no
> > problem working with the Dell LCD Model E152FPc and Wyse
> > S50. It would be really helpful if this issue could be
> > resolved. I really need to use a Debian distribution on
> > the Wyse S50.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > John L. Males
> > Toronto, Ontario
> > Canada
> > 22 April 2010 01:19
> >
> >
> > ==============================================================
> > 2010-04-21 13:34:29.707486262-0400-EDT
> >
> > 21 Apr 13:34:29 ntpdate[17768]: ntpdate 4.2.2p4@1.1585-o Sun
> > Nov 22 16:42:03 UTC 2009 (1)
> >
> > 21 Apr 13:34:33 ntpdate[17772]: step time server
> > 206.248.190.142 offset -0.006971 sec
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFLz9xiYn2YdVH66oYRAvyrAKCQXOYxHIzQPBnSG2enFDwTwxd7MACgi
> > +0s plTcUZ4lXwS4nQQDcqQrVoU=
> > =cgyu
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ==============================================================
> 2010-04-28 22:39:34.373996268-0400-EDT
>
> 28 Apr 22:39:34 ntpdate[14569]: ntpdate 4.2.2p4@1.1585-o Sun
> Nov 22 16:42:03 UTC 2009 (1)
>
> 28 Apr 22:39:38 ntpdate[14573]: step time server 208.80.96.70
> offset -0.043024 sec
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFL2PNnYn2YdVH66oYRAh2eAKCw9Rwu2I/SBLwAWc6WEWw3kaViMgCfXW/a
> 7Zj7JJcf335QK4SRT0zS8rw=
> =72h0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
==============================================================
2010-04-29 03:47:26.321026724-0400-EDT
29 Apr 03:47:26 ntpdate[24593]: ntpdate 4.2.2p4@1.1585-o Sun
Nov 22 16:42:03 UTC 2009 (1)
29 Apr 03:47:29 ntpdate[24597]: step time server 129.128.5.210
offset -0.016330 sec
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFL2Tr5Yn2YdVH66oYRAjT1AKCc5wJlEL9RyTy9T1ut1672rtGOzgCfaxOm
WjlTCEmLgWiD59dd0lXEGz4=
=DErK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: