Marco Amadori wrote:
On Tuesday 16 June 2009, 14:51:45, Steven Shiau wrote:pls find following some patches to the live-intramfs code for initial Ubuntu (<=Jaunty) support.From http://aufs.sourceforge.net/Note: it becomes clear that "Aufs was rejected. Let's give it up." According to Christoph Hellwig, linux rejects all union-type filesystems but UnionMount.Therefore in the future, maybe it's better that live-initramfs can support unionfs-fuse, and unionmount. My 2 cents.Is unionmount already mature?
AFAIK, no, and it's not in kernel 2.6.30.
Could it mount NFS too? How it handles whiteouts?It seems to me the cleaner solution in theory, but maybe it is just too young right now.
I agree. Steven.
-- Steven Shiau <steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. http://www.nchc.org.tw Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A