LH_BINARY_IMAGES was: Rescue flavor improvements

Subject: LH_BINARY_IMAGES was: Rescue flavor improvements
From: tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com (Tzafrir Cohen)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:46:36 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20080428104636.GN27523@xorcom.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 55c223960804280309v1e2bd84ara60430cef6111553@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 55c223960804280309v1e2bd84ara60430cef6111553@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:09:37AM +0100, Alex Owen wrote:
> >  The obvious example is  LH_BINARY_IMAGES,which can contain permutations of
> >  "iso", "usb-hdd" and "net".
> 
> So if I find a place in the code where LH_BINARY_IMAGES is expected to
> be single valued (ie not a list of image types) then that is a bug?

This is just a theoretical question, right?

-- 
               Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755              jabber:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
+972-50-7952406           mailto:tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:guest at local.xorcom.com/tzafrir

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- LH_BINARY_IMAGES was: Rescue flavor improvements
  - From: daniel at debian.org (Daniel Baumann)
- LH_BINARY_IMAGES was: Rescue flavor improvements
  - From: r.alex.owen at gmail.com (Alex Owen)

References:
- LH_BINARY_IMAGES was: Rescue flavor improvements
  - From: r.alex.owen at gmail.com (Alex Owen)

Prev by Date: Rescue flavor improvements
Next by Date: Default user decisions
Previous by thread: LH_BINARY_IMAGES was: Rescue flavor improvements
Next by thread: LH_BINARY_IMAGES was: Rescue flavor improvements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread