Default user decisions
- Subject: Default user decisions
- From: jreese at leetcode.net (John Reese)
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 09:48:45 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4819CA3D.5040802@leetcode.net>
- In-reply-to: <200805010016.01769.marco.amadori@gmail.com>
- References: <481442B2.6020605@debian.org> <200805010016.01769.marco.amadori@gmail.com>
Marco Amadori wrote:
> Alle Sunday 27 April 2008, Daniel Baumann ha scritto:
>
>> The only other live system I know remotely, uses username 'ubuntu' and
>> no password.
>
>> That made me curious what others think. So, what do *you* guys think?
>> Should it be left as is? Or do you have other preferences? How do other
>> live systems do it?
>
> ssh wise, Ubuntu's choice is more secure, because it disallows ssh logins if
> the local console user did not provide a new password.
>
> I think that using a NULL password like ubuntu do and providing both an
> interactive way to change it and a boot parameter could be the way I would
> like to have the user password managed.
>
> That way we could have a more secure default image approach, a secure personal
> use approach and the ability to set a password easely at build time.
I have to agree with this. I really like the Ubuntu approach to
securing the root/default users, and I'd like to put my support behind
making this behavior the preferred method.
--
John Reese
LeetCode.net
Reply to: