LH_BINARY_IMAGES was: Rescue flavor improvements
2008/4/28 Tzafrir Cohen <tzafrir.cohen at xorcom.com>:
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:09:37AM +0100, Alex Owen wrote:
> > > The obvious example is LH_BINARY_IMAGES,which can contain permutations of
> > > "iso", "usb-hdd" and "net".
> >
> > So if I find a place in the code where LH_BINARY_IMAGES is expected to
> > be single valued (ie not a list of image types) then that is a bug?
>
> This is just a theoretical question, right?
I'm not certain that the 'case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in' stanzas will
always do the right thing if LH_BINARY_IMAGES is a sapce seperated
list of image types!
Also code like this:
if [ ${LH_BINARY_IMAGES} = "iso" ] || [ ${LH_BINARY_IMAGES} = "usb-hdd" ]
$cat /etc/debian_version
4.0
$ dpkg -l live-helper
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version
Description
+++-================================-================================-================================================================================
ii live-helper 1.0~a45-1
Debian Live build scripts
$grep LH_BINARY_IMAGES /usr/bin/lh* | grep case
/usr/bin/lh_binary_debian-installer:case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in
/usr/bin/lh_binary_debian-installer:case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in
/usr/bin/lh_binary_grub:case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in
/usr/bin/lh_binary_grub:case ${LH_BINARY_IMAGES} in
/usr/bin/lh_binary_syslinux:case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in
/usr/bin/lh_binary_syslinux:case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in
/usr/bin/lh_binary_yaboot:case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in
/usr/bin/lh_binary_yaboot:case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in
/usr/bin/lh_chroot_hacks:case "${LH_BINARY_IMAGES}" in
Reply to: