chroot vs. image
On 3/6/07, Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> wrote:
> Gracie wrote:
> > Can you give an example of when to use --include-chroot versus
> > --include-image?
>
> --include-chroot includes files from your host system into the live system.
>
> --include-image includes files from your host system on the live cd
> itself, *not* the live system.
IOW --include-chroot is used for things like config files and scripts
that you want to put on the actual live system (the squashfs image),
whereas --include-image is used for things like readmes and
documentation that can be read off the disc like a normal file.
--
Andrew Donnellan
ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary) ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure)
http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com
ajdlinux@jabber.org.au hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58
http://linux.org.au http://debian.org
Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
Spammers only === ajdspambucket@exemail.com.au ===
Reply to: