On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Nilesh Patra wrote: >But why should it be omitted? I think moving it to info should be good >enough to do here -- we would like to encourage maintainers to move to >a newer watch version eventually. It’s likely fatal if they upgrade prematurely, though.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this?AFAIU, the lintian version that's released to unstable isn't targeted for packages in stable.
I (very candidly) don't understand why Trixie not supporting d/watch v5 is causing issues? Please be more verbose so we can address this issue :)
-- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄