[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1053710: lintian: Homepage: https://lintian.debian.org/ NXDOMAIN



https://salsa.debian.org/dsa-team/mirror/domains sayeth
(commits that mention lintian, after 2014):
  commit 19c1f45b63b0fe91222f2806bb1c81594d16d073
  Author: Pierre-Elliott Bécue <peb@debian.org>
  Date:   Mon Sep 18 10:34:47 2023 +0200
  
      RT9275: Drop CNAME lintian.debian.org
  
   debian.org | 1 -
   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
  
  commit a6d86f260a79593abc7e84482657cc1af09f9430
  Author: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
  Date:   Fri May 7 00:04:45 2021 +0200
  
      Move lintian.d.o to lintian-01
  
   debian.org | 2 +-
   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
  
  commit 3768edf828b5f2c576ad401625c6ea137ede1b12
  Author: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
  Date:   Sat May 1 23:23:48 2021 +0200
  
      Reserve IPs @ conova for lintian-01.d.o
  
   1.0.1.4.c.d.8.a.6.1.2.0.a.2.ip6.arpa | 1 +
   debian.org                           | 1 +
   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

3768edf828b5f2c576ad401625c6ea137ede1b12 adds PTRs,
a6d86f260a79593abc7e84482657cc1af09f9430 replaces
  lintian CNAME static
with
  lintian CNAME lintian-01,
and naturally
19c1f45b63b0fe91222f2806bb1c81594d16d073 removes
  lintian CNAME
entirely.

lintian-01.debian.org resolves and appears to nominally exist:
  https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=lintian-01

It responds to pings, but refuses 80 and 443.


Dialing static.d.o with Host: lintian.debian.org,
both klecker and mirror-csail respond with a generic "this is $HOST" page.


nagios.debian.org says lintian-01 is "UP" for 12 days,
and bases this on ping connectivity (which, I s'pose, makes it right).

https://munin.debian.org/debian.org/lintian-01.debian.org/index.html
says traffix in kilobytes per second all the way back to 2023-10-01,
and allthewhile 0 apache requests.


RT#9275 is inacessible to me, since guest logins to rt.d.o were removed,
so I'm unable to draw a conclusion.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: