[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1025164: lintian: missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend tag needs to check Build-Depends-Indep too



On 2022-12-01 01 h 52, Stuart Prescott wrote:
Hi Scott

On 01/12/2022 15:16, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, November 30, 2022 10:38:30 PM EST Stuart Prescott wrote:
Hi Scott,

On 01/12/2022 02:16, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Package: lintian
Version: 2.115.3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org

The missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend check appears to only
look for the prerequisite packages in Build-Depends, but since they
aren't needed for clean, they could be in Build-Depends-Indep, leading
to false positives.

Scott K

I contemplated filing a similar the other day but in writing it up, I
realised that lintian was correct. Policy requires that the 'clean'
target be functional with only the Build-Depends (and Build-Conflicts)
satisfied, and pybuild + the build-backend dependencies are involved in
the cleaning step.

Not always.  At least with the package I ran into this on, clean works fine
without them.

Yes indeed...

- the most obvious case where that works is where 'clean' is explicit in d/rules

- it would also be possible for it to work in situations where dh-python is (redundantly?) listed in B-D (not B-D-I), since the pyproject plugin's 'clean' operation has no dependency on `build`, `installer`, and the backend.

However, this for this second case:

- it might result in pybuild picking a different plugin through lack of dependencies like `tomli`. That might just work... but also feels slightly terrifying.

- there's not _currently_ any backend-specific cleaning code, but perhaps there should be, which would then need the deps to be in B-D? (Is that in the spec somewhere?)

I guess the main thing to be careful of in any rewording of this explanation is that for the most common case of using "%:\n\tdh --buildsystem pybuild", dh-python (or pybuild-plugin-pyproject) is needed in B-D not B-D-I to be policy-compliant.

cheers
Stuart

I've proposed a fix here:

https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/426

It's not precise enough to flag packages that would declare everything as a Build-Depends-Indep though. This would be much more complex and I feel this situation is overall pretty rare.

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: