Bug#1017094: false positive source-is-missing for gtk-doc generated html documentation

To: 1017094@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1017094: false positive source-is-missing for gtk-doc generated html documentation
From: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 23:59:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] cbcf7d32-572d-f2d1-c952-1b37611c00e9@debian.org>
Reply-to: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>, 1017094@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 166040126229.768808.7270743390674763424.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx>
References: <[🔎] 166040126229.768808.7270743390674763424.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx> <[🔎] 166040126229.768808.7270743390674763424.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx> <[🔎] 166040126229.768808.7270743390674763424.reportbug@pluto.milchstrasse.xx>

In general, it is not a good idea to have line length it as the only heuristic for checking source-is-missing on HTMLfiles. I have seen this on many packages that I have dealt with in the last few months and all of them were false positives.

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#1017094: false positive source-is-missing for gtk-doc generated html documentation
  - From: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#1013875: marked as done (lintian: false-postive for experimental-to-unstable-without-comment)
Next by Date: Replacements for {VENDOR} in profile Extends:
Previous by thread: Bug#1017094: false positive source-is-missing for gtk-doc generated html documentation
Next by thread: Bug#1017443: warning/error if changelog date too far in the past
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread