On Sat, 11 Jun 2022 16:28:15 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Francesco, Hello Axel, nice to read you! :-) > > Francesco Poli wrote: > > More than 6 months later, it seems that this bug is still unfixed in > > lintian: running lintian/2.114.0 produces the same complaints. > > Correct. > > See https://bugs.debian.org/1012289 formerly known as "O: lintian". Ouch! I had noticed that lintian was not getting new uploads, but I wasn't aware of its state of being basically orphan!!! > > > Is there any hope this bug can get fixed soon, along with the other RC > > bugs currently open against lintian, so that lintian can work better in > > sid (and also migrate to testing, see bug [#1003643] ...)? > > I'm now working on a new lintian release and I will work on the > currently open RC bugs. This is great news, I am very relieved to know that you are taking matters in your own hands. > > > > By the way: a new version (4.6.1) of Debian Policy has been released > > No wonder if noone was working on Lintian proper. There's a pull > request for this > (https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/393), > though and I'll likely merge it once I fixed the more severe and more > pressing issues, namely failing the failing autopkgtests in current > git HEAD (first) and the RC bug reports (second). Sounds like a very reasonable plan. Thank you so much for taking care of this! Bye. -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgpccU56k4I0H.pgp
Description: PGP signature