On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 19:23:32 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 00:56:11 +0100 Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> wrote: > [...] > > The same with XS-Go-Import-Path, and I guess a bunch of other fields > > that are unknown to dpkg-dev. > > Same here with my package (apt-listbugs). > > Running lintian/2.113.0 produces, among others, the following complaints: > > N: > I: apt-listbugs source: adopted-extended-field XB-Ruby-Versions (in secti= > on for apt-listbugs) [debian/control:16] [...] > What did I fail to understand? > Which is wrong? My modification attempt or the lintian check? [...] More than 6 months later, it seems that this bug is still unfixed in lintian: running lintian/2.114.0 produces the same complaints. Is there any hope this bug can get fixed soon, along with the other RC bugs currently open against lintian, so that lintian can work better in sid (and also migrate to testing, see bug [#1003643] ...)? By the way: a new version (4.6.1) of Debian Policy has been released and [announced] on May, the 11th, 2022: the lintian version currently in unstable (2.114.0) still fails to recognize it as a valid Policy version... [#1003643]: <https://bugs.debian.org/1003643> [announced]: <https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2022/05/msg00003.html> -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/ There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
Attachment:
pgptBVMKnON5H.pgp
Description: PGP signature