Bug#999601: [false positive] ocaml-dangling-cmi hint needs refinement

To: 999601@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@gmail.com>
Subject: Bug#999601: [false positive] ocaml-dangling-cmi hint needs refinement
From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 06:35:57 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] CAFHYt57QDW8qwpyrsQFSgTEw8daevU5=RbyRJ7ND09Q+nNE5sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>, 999601@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3c3382c0dfb2c978d9c41e1b8da55cdfb91c51a7.camel@gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 3c3382c0dfb2c978d9c41e1b8da55cdfb91c51a7.camel@gmail.com> <[🔎] 3c3382c0dfb2c978d9c41e1b8da55cdfb91c51a7.camel@gmail.com>

Hi Julien,

On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:15 AM Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I hope this is precise enough to improve the hint.

We would like to test improvements. Would you please point to
installable packages that triggered the false positives? Thanks!

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#999601: [false positive] ocaml-dangling-cmi hint needs refinement
  - From: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@gmail.com>

References:
- Bug#999601: [false positive] ocaml-dangling-cmi hint needs refinement
  - From: Julien Puydt <julien.puydt@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#999768: lintian: false report: adopted-extended-field XS-Autobuild
Next by Date: Bug#999785: built-using-field-on-arch-all-package emitted for non-Go packages
Previous by thread: Bug#999601: [false positive] ocaml-dangling-cmi hint needs refinement
Next by thread: Bug#999601: [false positive] ocaml-dangling-cmi hint needs refinement
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread