Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice

To: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
Cc: 995981@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice
From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 12:52:33 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] CAFHYt54+Sa0eyhV889eKjiav+Z6=1YvPKN_UP2zQ7G8qnu10bg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>, 995981@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAM8zJQsgAhVdtW4KnKa5qu0ScBr+G0F66jnDJ40-3gh1R3Vvww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <YWFclBnKL9/RnHs8@alf.mars> <[🔎] CAM8zJQtXksqHyox8+y86kX1jxydBubBKiwuap1KDk1CrTRmaUw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAFHYt55-_rXXWOqq5EA8SU0OoPyyyNXPY+JWWwVhYc9AeB9wjQ@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAM8zJQsgAhVdtW4KnKa5qu0ScBr+G0F66jnDJ40-3gh1R3Vvww@mail.gmail.com> <YWFclBnKL9/RnHs8@alf.mars>

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 12:29 PM Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> wrote:
>
> By "that bug", do you mean #998396?

I suppose I meant "this" bug #995981.

> codesearch.debian.net reveals even more affected packages:

Some of them are probably due to erroneous advice from Lintian for a
short period in early October (and possibly late September) but some,
like colortest-python, are clearly unrelated.

Either way, isn't the issue fixed?

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice
  - From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>
- Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice
  - From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
- Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice
  - From: Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice
Next by Date: Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice
Previous by thread: Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice
Next by thread: Bug#995981: rules-require-build-prerequisite gives bogus advice
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread