Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong

To: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>, 1001458@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong
From: Yadd <yadd@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:28:01 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 8d495413-41ce-d0ce-ae23-0b0c08b2942b@debian.org>
Reply-to: Yadd <yadd@debian.org>, 1001458@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAFHYt57=GhOhEeO472-aMNkXnnhtZUi_M55btQsQaG4hdyvs6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 163914415961.833448.13220164247769006453.reportbug@deb007.xnr.fr> <[🔎] CAFHYt57=GhOhEeO472-aMNkXnnhtZUi_M55btQsQaG4hdyvs6g@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 163914415961.833448.13220164247769006453.reportbug@deb007.xnr.fr>

On 10/12/2021 14:58, Felix Lechner wrote:

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 5:51 AM Yadd <yadd@debian.org> wrote:


That's why I think this tag shoud be removed.


I think I concur—but what's a MUT, please?


Multiple-Upstream-Tarballs package (from uscan(1) sorry ;-))

Cheers,
Yadd

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong
  - From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>

References:
- Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong
  - From: Yadd <yadd@debian.org>
- Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong
  - From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong
Next by Date: Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong
Previous by thread: Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong
Next by thread: Bug#1001458: lintian: tag prefer-uscan-symlink has bad name and may be wrong
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread