Bug#965189: marked as done (Lintian: triggers spelling-in-override-comment for spelling-error-in-binary override)
Your message dated Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:59:38 +0200
with message-id <CAJ2a_De=P9KbFrbK1rqvbNQDBNiLyA2wDQQ753rk=0VH7c8LkQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#965189: Acknowledgement (Lintian: triggers spelling-in-override-comment for spelling-error-in-binary override)
has caused the Debian Bug report #965189,
regarding Lintian: triggers spelling-in-override-comment for spelling-error-in-binary override
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
965189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: lintian
Version: 2.84.0
Lintian issues
W: rspamd: spelling-in-override-comment spelling-error-in-binary
(line 8) uite suite
when using an override like
rspamd: spelling-error-in-binary
usr/lib/rspamd/librspamd-server.so.2.5 uite suit
see https://salsa.debian.org/cgzones/rspamd/-/jobs/871310
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry for the noise; I should have read the description of the tag more careful.
Lintian does not complain about the misspelling "uite" being used in
the override line, but in the comment line above.
The amendment "(line 8)" confused me.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: