[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#964281: marked as pending in lintian



Hi Felix,

Felix Lechner wrote:
> In Debian patches, only check the DEP-3 header for legacy encoding.
> (Closes: #964281)

Yay, thanks!

> Splits Debian patches into parts and only checks patch headers for
> legacy encodings. Thank you to Axel Becker for that excellent idea.

Thanks for the praise. Unfortunately with a missing character in my
family name. :-/ (But yeah, it's a common typo and I'm used to it.)

> Thanks to Axel Beckert for his patience and the generosity of his time
> in reporting the oversight.

Oh, I considered it just a normal bug report with ideas how to maybe
fix it. :-)

> It ended up being a fun and easy fix.

Cool!

> As a side note, the bug reporter's statement about upstream files was
> not fully accurate.  The check never looked at upstream files.

Ah, sorry. I was aware of this, because the file name which was
reported and the file which needed to be patched had different file
suffixes (*.src vs *.wml). I just mentioned "upstream" to explain the
reason for the need to patch instead of just editing the files.

> This commit has a potential to disturb the release process.

Huh?

> Since building is broken in unstable, the package was built and
> examined with Lintian in a testing chroot.

Ah, this probably also explains why
https://lintian.debian.org/tags.html misses some of the new tags. I
searched for "breakout-link" in it for a reference to upstream several
times the past few days.

		Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-    |  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE


Reply to: