[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#953262: lintian.d.o: Provide archive-wide statistics on home page



Control: retitle -1 lintian.d.o: Provide archive-wide statistics on home page

Hi s3v,

> I would like to see stats of Lintian's tags get restored on the main web
> page of the project.

First of all, sorry our web service has been spotty. We hope it will
become one of people's favorite interfaces to research issues in
Debian packages.

Your request predates my involvement but I would like to understand
how to make our data more meaningful on an archive level. (The
'archive' is actually a fluid set of packages that is constantly
synchronized via dakweb.) I can find meaning only by slicing the data
in other dimensions, such as by architecture, or by providing
normalized averages, such as tags per package or overrides per
package, and so on.

Below you will find an old snapshot from the Internet Archive's
Wayback Machine. Which data was most useful to you, please, and why?

Kind regards,
Felix Lechner

* * *

Archives

The following archives are processed by Lintian:

Archive nameAttributeAttribute value
debianArchitecturesi386 amd64
Distributions/Suitesunstable experimental
Componentsmain contrib non-free
Mirror timestampSun, 21 Apr 2019 20:30:22 +0000
debian-debugArchitecturesi386 amd64
Distributions/Suitesunstable-debug experimental-debug
Componentsmain contrib non-free
Mirror timestampSun, 21 Apr 2019 20:30:22 +0000

Statistics

Last updated: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 00:33:21 +0000
Maintainers: 2423 (+0)
Package groups: 31284 (+5)
Rescheduled groups: 3 (+0)
Groups with processing errors: 3 (+0)
Source packages: 29929 (+1)
Binary packages: 39928 (-3)
μdeb packages: 225 (+0)
E Errors: 32305 (+4)
W Warnings: 186976 (-6)
I Info tags: 575740 (-196)
P Pedantic tags: 175454 (-42)
O Overridden tags: 181682 (-138)
X Experimental tags: 124653 (+25)
Lintian version: 2.12.0

(The numbers in parentheses describe the changes since the last
Lintian report, published on Sun, 21 Apr 2019 00:28:21 +0000.)


Reply to: