[ not a lintian maintainer ]
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 09:53:45AM +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> lintian understandably reports about a no longer required
> -Wl,--as-needed in bullseye. However, unless I'm mistaken, it's still
> needed for building for buster-backports, so removing it has a side effect.
IMHO, this is typical example of a tag that shouldn't have existed until
bullseye was stable. Having -Wl,--as-needed specified in d/rules AND as
internal default from ld brings no downsides whatsoever, bearing one
"extra" line in d/rules.
Instead, I can see how many man-minutes and precious brain cycles were
lost in bugs like this, since you are not the first person to raise this
question.
> The cleanest solution would probably be to remove it, and to simply
> re-add this flag during backporting, at the cost of manual intervention
> (beyond dch --bpo, that is).
>
> The pragmatic solution would be to just override the tag for packages
> where a backport might be expected.
I recommend you just either simply ignore the tag for those packages, or
please an override if it bothers you.
No need to overcomplicate a simple matter by removing and-readding flags
when they can simply just stay there.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature