Processed: lintian check portable-executable-missing-security-features disagrees with genpeimg about SafeSEH

To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Cc: lintian-maint@debian.org
Subject: Processed: lintian check portable-executable-missing-security-features disagrees with genpeimg about SafeSEH
From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 23:12:05 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.B.158344975329487.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 87zhcus8ku.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <[🔎] 87zhcus8ku.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>

Processing control commands:

> affects -1 src:win-iconv
Bug #953212 [lintian] lintian check portable-executable-missing-security-features disagrees with genpeimg about SafeSEH 
Added indication that 953212 affects src:win-iconv

-- 
953212: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=953212
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#953212: lintian check portable-executable-missing-security-features disagrees with genpeimg about SafeSEH
  - From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>

Prev by Date: Processed: Bug#929729 marked as pending in lintian
Next by Date: Bug#953212: lintian check portable-executable-missing-security-features disagrees with genpeimg about SafeSEH
Previous by thread: Bug#953212: lintian check portable-executable-missing-security-features disagrees with genpeimg about SafeSEH
Next by thread: Bug#953212: lintian check portable-executable-missing-security-features disagrees with genpeimg about SafeSEH
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread