Re: Bug#964111: dpkg-source: False positive 'points outside source root'
- To: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Cc: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>, Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>, debian-lint-maint@lists.debian.org, 964111@bugs.debian.org, munin@packages.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#964111: dpkg-source: False positive 'points outside source root'
- From: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 15:52:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20200707135208.GA264391@thunder.hadrons.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org>, Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>, Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>, Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>, debian-lint-maint@lists.debian.org, 964111@bugs.debian.org, munin@packages.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20200707092944.GA11400@layer-acht.org>
- References: <[🔎] CAFHYt5692-Db=_O1WhNnpmfh8DHeHcCjd3SGDpib0z1P-b7tBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200702225411.c2gvfds5ewkbwxol@acr13.nuvreauspam> <20200703051118.GA3678065@thunder.hadrons.org> <[🔎] CAFHYt571Nd_rB7G6RS-BjyYmJ4fo0PDVa5PxF0bLFN+MUbyFKA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAFHYt54tcG40Br5YjppaHsLjYVUtx6Tk3hucwM3SZTZtv=-mnw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20200704045429.GB3737627@thunder.hadrons.org> <[🔎] CAFHYt57kAm4D68_UcAhG=n=_BNzumypngco=KkK6yRFPpnH+ew@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20200707092944.GA11400@layer-acht.org>
On Tue, 2020-07-07 at 09:29:44 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:08:43PM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> > > not sure if this is the same bug or just a similar one:
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 user user 9 Jul 3 16:07 debian/munin.service -> /dev/null
> > As for Holger's package, Lintian also flags that condition. Source
> > packages can be unpacked anywhere. We likewise consider absolute
> > symlink targets unacceptable there.
> > W: munin source: absolute-symbolic-link-target-in-source
> > debian/munin.service -> /dev/null
>
> sigh. so IMNSHO now lintian *and* dpkg are buggy. Or point me to policy
> which prohibits files pointing to /dev/null. This worked for years.
>
> (I haven't cloned the dpkg bug yet, as I believed Guillem would upload a
> fix quickly and thus I wanted to prevent busy paperwork. IMO the bug
> should be cloned and the severity raised to serious for the clone.)
Holger, as I mentioned some days ago, I consider this case a
regression which I was planning on fixing. This fix was already
included earlier today in the dpkg 1.20.4 upload. :)
Thanks,
Guillem
Reply to: