[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#946075: marked as done (warn about node packages not in javascript section)

Your message dated Wed, 4 Dec 2019 04:15:12 +0000
with message-id <20191204041512.GA1372824@blodeuwedd>
and subject line Re: Bug#946075: warn about node packages not in javascript section
has caused the Debian Bug report #946075,
regarding warn about node packages not in javascript section
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
946075: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946075
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian
Version: 2.39.0
Severity: wishlist

It would be great if lintian could warn about node-* packages that are not in
the javascript section of the archive. A lot of packages are currently in the
"web" section.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils                     2.33.1-5
ii  bzip2                        1.0.8-2
ii  diffstat                     1.63-1
ii  dpkg                         1.19.7
ii  dpkg-dev                     1.19.7
ii  file                         1:5.37-6
ii  gettext                      0.19.8.1-10
ii  gpg                          2.2.17-3
ii  intltool-debian              0.35.0+20060710.5
ii  libapt-pkg-perl              0.1.36+b2
ii  libarchive-zip-perl          1.67-1
ii  libberkeleydb-perl           0.62-1+b1
ii  libcapture-tiny-perl         0.48-1
ii  libcgi-pm-perl               4.44-1
ii  libclass-accessor-perl       0.51-1
ii  libclass-xsaccessor-perl     1.19-3+b3
ii  libclone-perl                0.43-2
ii  libdpkg-perl                 1.19.7
ii  libemail-valid-perl          1.202-1
ii  libfile-basedir-perl         0.08-1
ii  libfile-find-rule-perl       0.34-1
ii  libio-async-loop-epoll-perl  0.20-1
ii  libio-async-perl             0.75-1
ii  libipc-run-perl              20180523.0-2
ii  liblist-compare-perl         0.53-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl       0.416-1+b5
ii  libmldbm-perl                2.05-2
ii  libmoo-perl                  2.003006-1
ii  libmoox-aliases-perl         0.001006-1
ii  libnamespace-clean-perl      0.27-1
ii  libpath-tiny-perl            0.108-1
ii  libtext-levenshtein-perl     0.13-1
ii  libtimedate-perl             2.3000-2
ii  libtry-tiny-perl             0.30-1
ii  libtype-tiny-perl            1.004004-1
ii  liburi-perl                  1.76-1
ii  libxml-simple-perl           2.25-1
ii  libyaml-libyaml-perl         0.80+repack-2+b1
ii  man-db                       2.9.0-1
ii  patchutils                   0.3.4-2+b1
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]    5.30.0-9
ii  t1utils                      1.41-3
ii  xz-utils                     5.2.4-1+b1

Versions of packages lintian recommends:
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl  0.19-1+b6

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
pn  binutils-multiarch     <none>
ii  libhtml-parser-perl    3.72-3+b4
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.58-1

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Chris,

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > It would be great if lintian could warn about node-* packages that are not in
> > the javascript section of the archive. A lot of packages are currently in the
> > "web" section.
> 
> As I understand it, it already does:
> 
>   https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/blob/master/data/fields/name_section_mappings#L17
> 
> If it does not, please provide a concrete usecase and retitle the bug
> along the lines of ("should but does not". :)  Marking this bug as
> moreinfo as not actionable at the moment, feel free to drop/modify
> this.
You're right, it already does. I was looking at an older copy of a
package with mismatching output from https://lintian.debian.org/,
which didn't have any relevant tags.

Thanks for name_section_mappings link, sorry for the noise. :-/

Cheers,

Jelmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: