Bug#939639: marked as done (lintian: autopkgtest failure on 32-bit architectures)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2019 03:20:44 +0000
with message-id <E1iBVwy-000IeO-0a@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#939639: fixed in lintian 2.22.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #939639,
regarding lintian: autopkgtest failure on 32-bit architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
939639: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939639
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lintian
Version: 2.20.0
Hi Maintainer
Since the upload of lintian 2.20.0, lintian's own autopkgtests have
been failing on i386 and armhf in Ubuntu, with the three errors below.
These failures can also be seen in Debian, in the reproducible builds
for these architectures [1][2].
Regards
Graham
[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/i386/lintian.html
[2] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/armhf/lintian.html
# Failed test 'Lintian passes for binaries-missing-lfs'
# at /build/1st/lintian-2.20.0/lib/Test/Lintian/Run.pm line 299.
# Tags do not match
#
# --- debian/test-out/tags/checks/binaries/binaries-missing-lfs/tags.specified.calibrated
# +++ debian/test-out/tags/checks/binaries/binaries-missing-lfs/tags.actual.parsed
# -libbasic2 (binary): symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field
#
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
# Failed test 'Lintian passes for binaries-missing-lfs'
# at /build/1st/lintian-2.20.0/lib/Test/Lintian/Run.pm line 299.
# Tags do not match
#
# --- debian/test-out/tags/checks/fields/binaries-missing-lfs/tags.specified.calibrated
# +++ debian/test-out/tags/checks/fields/binaries-missing-lfs/tags.actual.parsed
# -libbasic2 (binary): symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field
# -libbasic2 (binary): binary-file-built-without-LFS-support
usr/lib/libbasic.so.2
# +
#
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
# Failed test 'Lintian passes for binaries-missing-lfs'
# at /tmp/autopkgtest.MxNcZS/build.NKX/src/lib/Test/Lintian/Run.pm line 299.
# Tags do not match
#
# --- ../../autopkgtest_tmp/testsuite/tags/checks/fields/binaries-missing-lfs/tags.specified.calibrated
# +++ ../../autopkgtest_tmp/testsuite/tags/checks/fields/binaries-missing-lfs/tags.actual.parsed
# -libbasic2 (binary): symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field
# -libbasic2 (binary): binary-file-built-without-LFS-support
usr/lib/libbasic.so.2
# +
#
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: lintian
Source-Version: 2.22.0
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lintian, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 939639@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> (supplier of updated lintian package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 02:49:05 +0000
Source: lintian
Architecture: source
Version: 2.22.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers <lintian-maint@debian.org>
Changed-By: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Closes: 933240 933500 939639 939673 939674 939698 939874 940082 940282
Changes:
lintian (2.22.0) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Summary of tag changes:
+ Added:
- homepage-refers-to-obsolete-debian-infrastructure
- license-file-listed-in-debian-copyright
- odd-historical-debian-changelog-version
+ Removed:
- debian-changelog-version-requires-debian-revision
- hyphen-in-native-debian-changelog-version
- latest-debian-changelog-entry-changed-to-native
- pear-package-feature-requires-newer-pkg-php-tools
+ Renamed:
- rules-requires-root-implicitly -> rules-requires-root-missing
.
[ Chris Lamb ]
* Check for packages still refering to the deprecated Alioth
service in their Homepage field. (Closes: #933500)
* Quote the package build path to avoid test failures when building in a
directory whose name contains a '+' or other regex metacharacters.
(Closes: #939674)
* Don't emit the missing-build-dependency,
package-uses-debhelper-but-lacks-build-depends or
debhelper-but-no-misc-depends tags for packages that do not use
debhelper but use specific parts of dh-autoreconf. (Closes: #939874)
* Emit missing-build-dependency for packages that do not use debhelper
but use specific parts of dh-autoreconf without build-depending on it.
* Revert merging our two CI pipeline stages. Whilst this avoided an
additional ~5 minute initial setup/teardown time, it meant that the
cache misses attempted to do both the within the 1h timeout. Whilst we
might still timeout overall, at least with a split we are very likely
to have cached the build packages.
* Upgrade and rename classification-level tag
rules-requires-root-implicitly to rules-requires-root-missing. (Closes:
#933240)
* Drop the unnecessary pear-package-feature-requires-newer-pkg-php-tools
tag. Thanks, Antonio Ospite and David Prévot. (Closes: #939698
* Don't emit latest-debian-changelog-entry-changed-to-native if the
latest changelog entry references "native package".
.
[ Felix Lechner ]
* Remove parts related to gzip timestamps from the files-general test.
(Closes: #939673)
* Refocus the 'binaries-missing-lfs' test on the tag
'binary-file-built-without-LFS-support'. (Closes: #939639)
* Add the changelog-distribution-does-not-match-changes-file tag to the
ftp-master-auto-reject profile
* In Lintian::Collect::Source, use a centralized version parser.
* Add new tag 'license-file-listed-in-debian-copyright' to avoid
unnecessary clutter.
* Fix command-line processing for --check-part so 'all' can also be part
of a list.
* Associate the multiline-field tag with the 'lintian' check.
.
[ Xavier ]
* Fix false-postivies when checking for the
pkg-js-autopkgtest-file-does-not-exist tag with regards to comments.
(Closes: #940082)
.
[ Rafael Laboissiere ]
* Avoid false positives for library-not-linked-against-libc with Octave
add-ons. (Closes: #940282)
.
[ Faidon Liambotis ]
* Use the "build-depends-all" relation to correctly detect binaries built
with Go.
Checksums-Sha1:
b3ba8c532a81a62bcaab5bc7818b52f8dbfbb200 3920 lintian_2.22.0.dsc
93a2f6a0d32494e68253f52f18923f6856fb3136 1762732 lintian_2.22.0.tar.xz
a11966be931790a7822d49c1d0fc02d7da16032a 16550 lintian_2.22.0_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
538c70b3189106337a344c7828a85d5ccecaa0ffc3ce6cae7fcf6ed007aefa06 3920 lintian_2.22.0.dsc
9cf990c7c021942aac17807b9e4161082c58acf75b4a4286afa99b6db87d2d36 1762732 lintian_2.22.0.tar.xz
c96420ee91c61c5c5bd2a28c08a0ce12ac9d2889f28311469eb0312db7a2dedc 16550 lintian_2.22.0_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
df9f82f945b16b8f7c330f397060df35 3920 devel optional lintian_2.22.0.dsc
384c785d73f9a975551e77846194e7ed 1762732 devel optional lintian_2.22.0.tar.xz
b6fb065ca15a98ddcdd43003181caf77 16550 devel optional lintian_2.22.0_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=r2Nt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: