Bug#865847: Use reStructuredText for Lintian manual
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:09 PM Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org> wrote:
>
> I would concede that RST might be more suitable for more complex
> requirements indeed.
Ok, I am going to merge this soon. At least it's a step in the right
direction. Let's see if we all can get comfortable with the RST
format.
I am currently writing a brief testing manual. (After that, I hope to
freeze the list of untested tags.) That will be a good experiment from
all sides with respect to the format.
Thank you to Russ for the comment about the policy document. I would
have preferred more consensus; perhaps it is safe to say that we are
all -1 on docbook.
Kind regards,
Felix
Reply to: