Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2019 08:45:45 -0800 with message-id <CAFHYt54jRvUYQKXqiq+SYHD8QTUiuHu_Bi=MMub+soJ36Ped2Q@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Closed upon request of filer has caused the Debian Bug report #543260, regarding lintian: Please revisit or temper patch-system-but-no-source-readme to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 543260: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543260 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Please revisit or temper "patch-system-but-no-source-readme" tag
- From: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:12:39 +0100
- Message-id: <20090823181239.177c80df@sakaki.chris-lamb.co.uk>
Package: lintian Severity: wishlist Version: 2.2.14 Hi Lintian devs. Can we revisit the addition of the "patch-system-but-no-source-readme" warning? I feel that assuming that all packages that use a patch system require a README.source is damaging to the concept of README.source. As the archive grows more boilerplate descriptions on how to invoke quilt et al, I fear maintainers will simply not bother to consult this file when examining a package. This is particularly unfortunate as, not only can the file be extremely useful, I fear it will fuel a cycle of maintainers not updating the file with information as it does not get read anymore. If the motivation behind README.source is to highlight non-trivial packaging, then many packages can be presented that are trivial dispite using a patch system - it seems to me that the usage of dpatch and quilt is so common that it may be assumed from this tag's point of view. Besides, the concept of boilerplate is hardly anthemic in Debian. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` lamby@debian.org `-Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 543260-done@bugs.debian.org, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>, Raphael Geissert <geissert@debian.org>
- Subject: Closed upon request of filer
- From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 08:45:45 -0800
- Message-id: <CAFHYt54jRvUYQKXqiq+SYHD8QTUiuHu_Bi=MMub+soJ36Ped2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Chris, > I am happy to close this bug. In accordance with your wishes, the bug is now closed. :) Kind regards Felix Lechner
--- End Message ---