Bug#933109: package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script produces too many false positives
Hi Francesco,
> As I have [previously] said, this Lintian check should try hard to
> be more accurate
Agreed, I just did not find the time/bandwidth to do this until now...
> Please improve this check soon: I would rather avoid having to
> introduce a Lintian override into my package...
I understand the desire to have a 100% clean package but this not only
is unnecessary it hinders Lintian's improvement as it removes some of
the incentive to file or follow-up to bugs.
I would thus highly recommend maintainers do not workaround Lintian
bugs or (fixable) false-positives by adding overrides to their
packages.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` lamby@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Reply to: