[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#932870: lintian: check that there are some autopkgtests that don't have Restrictions: superficial



tags 932870 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi Paul,

> autopkgtests that have Restrictions: superficial do not provide
> significant test coverage. Please add a tag that is similar to the
> testsuite-autopkgtest-missing tag that is shown when there are no
> autopkgtests that are not marked as superficial.

Parallel to my comment on #932862, what would you say to simply also
emitting testsuite-autopkgtest-missing in this case (and naturally
updating the description, etc).

What I really mean to say is that I wonder whether we should zoom out
a bit and get a good picture about what we want in this area without
any duplicative code or effort. :)


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-


Reply to: