On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 02:27:51PM -0400, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Mattia, just to gauge your opinion, what would you hypothethically say
> to a "P:" check for this and, separately, the current "I:" autopkgtest
> check?
I only say that, out of 24 packages listed in my ddpo, 4 already have
gitlab-ci enabled to run their own tests (and they are all native or
pseudo-native packages). Of the remaining perhaps only 1 or 2 more
packages would make sense to have a CI for, but I have no interest
whatsoever to test the remaining at every commit, and for quite a few of
them it wouldn't even make sense since they lack a testsuite (and no, I
don't think test-building the whole package every commit is useful, the
only case where I find a full test build useful is when that is run on
architectures I don't usually use, which is not the case here; also, for
that we have the buildds).
So, an hypothetical P check for a .gitlab-ci.yml file would just be
another check that ends up in my ignore list…
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature