Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives

To: "Scott Kitterman" <debian@kitterman.com>, 926060@bugs.debian.org
Cc: control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives
From: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 04:45:44 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] ffdef0ef-ae26-4138-afc0-9dfe47f22e6a@www.fastmail.com>
Reply-to: "Chris Lamb" <lamby@debian.org>, 926060@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20190331051840.22127.71420.reportbug@kitterma-E6430>
References: <20190331051840.22127.71420.reportbug@kitterma-E6430> <20190331051840.22127.71420.reportbug@kitterma-E6430>

tags 926060 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi Scott,

> I'm reasonably confident that clamav testfiles don't need hardening features,
> so [1] seems pretty pointless.

I don't disagree at all here but I'm wondering how Lintian would be
able to detect that these are test files? Perhaps I'm missing
something. :)


Best wishes,

-- 
      ,''`.
     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'`      lamby@debian.org 🍥 chris-lamb.co.uk
       `-

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives
  - From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
- Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives
Next by Date: Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives
Previous by thread: Jenkins build is back to normal : lintian-tests_stretch-backports #878
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#926060: lintian: portable-executable-missing-security-features false positives
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread