Bug#922402: Bug #922402 in lintian marked as pending
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 09:46:52PM +0000, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Control: tag -1 pending
>
> Hello,
>
> Bug #922402 in lintian reported by you has been fixed in the
> Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
> message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/commit/603d9f2c5f54af162dbbfccf370d1881bbc9430f
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Prevent false positives in pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library (eg. "-lm") by creating an exception list and populating with shared objects shipped by libc6-dev. (Closes: #922402)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Hi Chris,
As I was working on packaging the new mongo-c-driver upstream, I
encountered the same problem, though with different libraries.
Here is the line from the pkg-config file:
Libs: -L${libdir} -lbson-static-1.0 -lpthread -lgcc -lgcc_s -lc -lgcc
-lgcc_s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so
The complaints from lintian:
W: libbson-dev: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libbson-static-1.0.pc -lpthread (line 9)
W: libbson-dev: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libbson-static-1.0.pc -lgcc (line 9)
W: libbson-dev: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libbson-static-1.0.pc -lgcc_s (line 9)
W: libbson-dev: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libbson-static-1.0.pc -lc (line 9)
W: libbson-dev: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libbson-static-1.0.pc -lgcc (line 9)
W: libbson-dev: pkg-config-references-unknown-shared-library usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/libbson-static-1.0.pc -lgcc_s (line 9)
It looks like perhaps libraries files shipped in libgcc1 also need to be
added to the whitelist.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
Reply to: